Well, hasn’t this turned into an interesting topic?
Half the world believes it, half is not, and all look to the media for their thoughts. Not once have I ever talked to anybody who has been able to produce any sort of scientific article, if it is from a magazine, or on the internet. Every single “unmuzzled” scientist has been talking through the media, and the rest say that it is natural. The republicans deny it, while the democrats think we need to so something and I am by no means a republican.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/science/earth/02cnd-climate.html?ex=1328072400en=1cafd041af902dd5ei=5088partner=rssnytemc=rss
Media
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/02/climate.change.report/
Media
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/01/why_global_warming_is_probably.html
Written by a scientist
In fact, since the government controls so much of the media, despite what we call a democracy, it is hard to find scientific data on this. The fact that I was only able to get one article written by one scientist, whereas a couple years ago I could bring up sites that say humans contribute .22% to global warming, and 5% if you include water vapor, on every single site I went to including only science related topics, shows you what kind of proof the internet has. If I were to tell its reliability, I would send it to about 30%. Now all you will find are “nytimes” or “CNN” or “MSNBC” and those journalists writing “over 90% of global warming is because of humans”
Although, how can that be true, when ABC news tells us that 12% of global warming is produced by livestock?
“Do some math, the authors say, and you find that livestock is responsible for 18 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas problem.”
Oh well, go on believing every white lie the media spits out at you, and while your at it, suck Al Gores pathetic little dick.
Entries (RSS)
April 20th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Whether global warming is caused by humans or not to me is fairly irrelevant. We need to stop fucking polluting so much and turning our planet into a shithole. If global warming is the craze word to get lazy fucks to walk every once in a while instead of driving their car, fine by me.
There’s lots of small things people could do that would add up huge. Don’t drive your car one day a week, use CFL bulbs, don’t leave lights on you aren’t using, don’t drive multiple cars to the same destination, etc.
Imagine if every person on earth biked / walked to work just once a week how great it would be.
Let global warming be the boogey man, nothing bad can come of people being a little more conscious of how they treat our planet.
April 20th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
Good article BTW.
April 20th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
While that is all true, the statistics still show that the human population dosn’t affect it that much, so walking/biking won’t do much, unless your going by media standards.
Personally, I bike to work, and rarely have my lights on anyways…
April 21st, 2007 at 4:39 am
Whilst walking/biking to work might not affect the environment it would lower incidences of obesity, and given that overweight and heart issues are the no 1 causes of death in the US (and other western countries atm) that can only be a good thing
May 18th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
[…] to read for the information, not the occational spelling mistake, or somthing that sounds wrong. F-insweet » Blog Archive » Global Warming Also, the earth isn’t going to be destroyed. All the a-bombs in the world couldn’t destroy it. The […]